6.7 KiB
Contributing to Pantheon
Thanks for your interest in Pantheon. This document covers the basics.
Licensing of contributions — read this first
Pantheon ships under AGPL-3.0 (see LICENSE).
Contributions are made under the Contributor License Agreement in
CLA.md, which grants me a broad copyright and patent license, including the right to sublicense your contribution under any terms and to transfer that right along with the project.
You keep your copyright. The CLA is a license, not an assignment — nothing is transferred away from you. Your contribution stays yours to use, publish, sell, or license to anyone else, anywhere, forever.
Signing takes one commit: add your entry to
.cla/signatures.md in your first pull request. Nothing
to print, scan, or email. Organizations whose employees contribute on company
time sign CLA-CORPORATE.md by email instead.
If you would rather not sign, open an issue describing the change instead of a pull request. An idea costs nothing to accept.
Sign your commits (DCO)
Every commit must carry a Signed-off-by line certifying the
Developer Certificate of Origin — that you
wrote the code, or otherwise have the right to submit it:
git commit -s -m "your message"
which appends:
Signed-off-by: Your Name <your.email@example.com>
Use your real name and a working email address — the same address as your CLA roster entry, since that is what CI matches on. If you are contributing work your employer owns, confirm you actually have the right to do so before you sign off.
Both checks run in CI on every pull request, and you can run them yourself first:
./scripts/check-dco.sh # every commit signed off, matching its author
./scripts/check-cla.sh # every author on the CLA roster
./scripts/check-headers.sh # every source file you ADD has SPDX + the @file block
License header on new files
Every source file starts with:
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later */
/* Copyright (C) 2026 David (Corey) Herrera */
Add it to new files you create. Do not edit the copyright line on existing files
— you keep your copyright in what you contribute without needing a line in the
header, and a per-file list of names becomes unmaintainable fast. git log and
.cla/signatures.md are the authoritative record of who wrote what.
Getting Started
Pantheon builds on Foundry, a git submodule at ./foundry. Clone with
git clone --recursive https://git.teamide.dev/David/Pantheon.git, or run
git submodule update --init in an existing clone. The Makefile uses, in order,
FOUNDRY=<path>, then ./foundry (the submodule or a symlink), then ../foundry
(a sibling checkout).
make USE_BLAS=1 pantheon # build the CLI
make USE_BLAS=1 test # build + run the test suites
make DEBUG=1 USE_BLAS=1 pantheon
make clean
| Flag | What | When |
|---|---|---|
USE_BLAS=1 |
SGEMV/SGEMM via Accelerate or OpenBLAS | always |
USE_THREADS=1 |
pthread pool for parallel ops | multi-core inference |
USE_METAL=1 |
Metal GPU compute | macOS / Apple Silicon |
USE_CUDA=1 |
CUDA via dlopen (cuBLAS + embedded PTX) |
Linux + NVIDIA |
Code Style
- C11 (
-std=c11); no dependencies beyond Foundry, libc, libm, pthreads and libdl (BLAS and accelerator frameworks are opt-in build flags) pn_prefix on all Pantheon symbols- Errors: return
NULLor an error code — noexit()in library code - Opaque types in the public API (
include/pantheon.h); concrete structs stay internal - Callers free returned objects via
pn_free() snprintf, neversprintf- No warnings under
-Wall -Wextra
Broader conventions live in coding-best-practices.md.
Testing
Tests use Foundry's lib/test.h framework and live in tests/. Add a matching
target in the Makefile.
If you change a forward pass or a kernel, show numerical parity. The bar is argmax-exact against the reference path (CPU, or an existing oracle) on a real model — not "it produces plausible text." Include how you measured it in the PR.
Pull Requests
Code is reviewed against
docs/coding-best-practices.md, cited by rule
number. This section covers the PR itself.
One logical change per PR.
Size. Reviewable lines = added + deleted, excluding generated files, pure renames, and vendored imports.
| Reviewable lines | |
|---|---|
| ≤ 400 | normal |
| 400–1,000 | expect a request to split |
| > 1,000, or > 15 files | state in one line why it can't be split |
Exempt from the size limits — but must be alone in their own PR:
- Generated sources. State the regeneration command, toolchain version, and target arch. Reviewed by rebuilding, not by reading.
- Pure moves and renames. No content change in the same commit.
- Mechanical sweeps. Include the command that reproduces the diff.
- Vendored or backend imports.
Evidence.
- Performance claim — the command, the device, before/after in tok/s, and the noise floor. A multiplier on its own is not a result.
- Forward pass or kernel — parity against the reference path, argmax-exact or ulp-0, naming the model and quantization.
- A test you call green — show it can go red (rule 8). Delete the
.oand the test binary first, or you may be running the old one. - Untested — say so plainly rather than leaving it implied.
Keep it short. Title is scope: imperative summary, lowercase scope, ≤72
characters. The body says what changed and why in a few lines. Commit messages
the same: a subject line, and a body only when the reason isn't visible in the
diff. Long rationale belongs in a spec file, not a commit message. No tool,
assistant, or generator attribution anywhere — title, body, or comments.
Review comments carry a severity prefix:
blocker:— must change before mergequestion:— answer before mergenit:— optional, never blocks
Unprefixed reads as nit:. The author does not resolve a blocker: thread — the
reviewer does. Approval goes stale when new commits land, unless they are a
rebase or a fixup.
Merge bar: builds clean with zero warnings, tests pass, DCO and CLA checks green, and the code meets the practices doc.
Reporting Bugs
Open an issue with:
- what you expected, and what actually happened
- minimal reproduction steps
- the model and quantization involved (many bugs are format-specific)
- your platform, compiler version, and GPU + driver if relevant
Bugs that only appear at a particular context depth, batch size, or concurrency level are common here — please say which, since it is usually the whole clue.